I don't have a great explanation for this: his minutes went up, his FG attempts went up but his FT attempts went down despite having a FT% of only 68%.
Date W / L MP FG FGA FT FTA FT\% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK PF PTS
The reason to get the FT is they beat the pants off The Economist on everything except American politics — they were excellent, and even prescient, on the financial crisis.
The very short final line of the Kramer article in the FT is the key.
I read the FT and WSJ online and although the FT is hideously pro-EU and up until recently somewhat pro-Labour their figure reporting is excellent as is the WSJ.